reaching everyone for active citizenry @ home
Singapore Government
 
 
Welcome to the REACH Portal.

i-REACH (May 2013) is out now.
 

Discussion Forum - Archives

12 Mar 2012, 1.17PM
Budget airlines become very popular. They are not just cheaper but they allow online booking. Many customers prefer go online instead of visiting travel agencies.

Our Budget terminal provide very basic service. In compare with Hong Kong, there are almost no different between budget airline passengers and non budget airline. The service standard is the same.

In Manila, budget airline Cebu Pacific use T3. The best airport terminal in Manila.

In China ,Shenzhen, all passengers included Tiger airways use the same airport terminal.

None of the above mentioned terminal will require waiting passenger to stand and queue. However, In Singapore Budget terminal passenger have to stand and queue in front of gates. Air conditioning is not strong enough. Passenger will feel hot during sunny day. Every year many visitors will use budget terminal. They may not be impress with our BT

If other countries e.g. Philippine, Hong Kong , China .... etc can maintenance such better standard. Why our BT have to be left behind ?

At least BT shall provide enough seats for all waiting passengers in front of gate. BT's standard shall not be too far away from Manila's T3 or Shenzhen's airport terminal.

 
795 views  |  1 comments & replies  | 
Guest
12 Mar 2012, 6.26PM
1. Do we really need a different terminal for budget airlines?

2. The existing BT was constructed in a hurry, and it doesn't sit well with the other international terminals in the area. The whole aerospace landscape is spoilt by this eye-sore project. But if we improve it structurally, then it is as good as putting budget airlines back to where they were. So is it a necessity?
Discussion Forum - Archives


Search Archives

Best viewed at 1024*768 resolution with IE 7.0 or FireFox 3.0