reaching everyone for active citizenry @ home
Singapore Government
 
 
Welcome to the REACH Portal.

i-REACH (May 2013) is out now.
 

Discussion Forum - Archives

20 May 2012, 11.43AM
Political pundits, laymen, netizens, almost everyone, all spell doom for the PAP candidate. I support no particular Party. What bothers me is the lack of diversity of views. This does not augur well for a free-thinking society.  I decide not to follow the crowd but free my thoughts, look at things from  different perspectives, make my own analysis and arrive at my own conclusion. To my own surprise, I find good reasons to believe the the PAP candidate Desmond Choo actually stands a good chance of winning.

The political landscape has changed for the better. There are now five MPs from the WP. You can scream “Five is not enough!”. True. But must that one more come from Hougang? It had provided one for the last 20+ years. The most recent one, YSL, was elected with much fanfare but it turned out to be a much ado about nothing.

For the saga of YSL, disappointment is an understatement. The voters of Hougang bore a deep sense of betrayal by the WP. Over the 20+ years, they believed in the WP and had sacrificed so much for the sake of democracy in Singapore. As result, their constituency is one of the least developed. In the last election, they were made to believe that YSL would be a capable candidate who would be their  voice, and one more voice of the WP, in Parliament. It turned out that before he could utter a word on their behalf, he was booted out by none other than his own Party. I doubt many people in Hougang believed that the WP did not know about his flings before the election. The people of Hougang are not daft.

Desmond Choo has been walking the grounds of Hougang and warming to the residents there for the past 5+ years. Png Eng Huat just walk in from the cold.  Desmond Choo has connected well with the people of Hougang, attending to their problems and needs. They can see that he soldiers on even after the defeat in the last election. What has Mr. Png done for  Hougang? Will he still be around if he loses the by-election? The contrast in past records between the two candidates is big. This can make a big difference to the vote count. Potong Pasir is a good example. Seetoh continued to walk the ground and connect with the people despite two defeats in past elections. When the SPP  chose a housewife who could hardly hold a conversation on public TV to compete with him, the contrast was just too great. The choice became clearer to the voters and Seetoh won.

Besides the contrast in past records, its the difference in personality between the two candidates. I do not want to repeat what others have said. Personally, I find that Desmond Choo exudes warmth and is a good communicator. Mr. Png, to me, seems like someone more destined for the backroom, doing the thinking work, dealing with planning and strategy.

Based on the above analysis, a swing of 15% or more votes to the PAP is not a miracle.  Desmond Choo stands a good chance of winning. I predict a victory for him within a margin of not more than 5%.



782 views  |  21 comments & replies  | 
TGKL
20 May 2012, 2.00PM
THERE HAS BEEN SO MANY SPECULATIONS AS TO WP OR PAP WILL WIN ON 26/5/2012.
THERE ARE MANY ISSUES THAT THE PAP HAS TO CONSIDER AND RECTIFY IF IT REALLY WANTS TO WIN BACK HOUGANG.

1.    THE PEOPLE OF HOUGANG HAD BEEN SURVIVING UNDER THIS LIVING CONDITIONS FOR 2 DECADES. THEY ARE SO USE TO IT WITHOUT ALL THE UPGRADINGS WORKS ENJOYED BY OTHER CONSTITUENCIES. WITH OR WITHOUT THEM DOESN'T MATTER IS THEIR MENTALITY.

THE PEOPLE OF HOUGANG KNOW THAT THE WP IS ABLE AND CAPABLE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW MARKET AND THE LINKWAYS BUT UNABLE TO FULFILL BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT (PAP) IS NOT BACKING IT. THEY ARE ABLE TO GET THE LINK WAY COMPLETED WITH SOME FUNDS SOONER OR LATER. ON THE OTHER HAND, THEY WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO GET THE APPROVAL FOR THE WET MARKET FROM THE PAP GOVT. THIS IS WELL UNDERSTOOD BY THE PEOPLE OF HOUGANG.

WHEREAS DESMOND CHOO IS ABLE TO GET BOTH PROJECTS COMPLETED WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE PAP GOVT. IRREGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE IS CAPABLE OR NOT.

THE VOTES GIVEN TO THE WP IS CONFRONTATIONAL AND INCREASED IN EVERY ELECTION.
THE SPIRIT IN HOUGANG IS 吃软不吃硬。

THE FACT THAT PM LHL SAYS DESMOND WILL RECEIVE FULL STRONG BACKING IS GOING TO BACKFIRE. IF HE LOOSES, WILL HE RECEIVE FULL BACKING AFTER THE ELECTION?

HELPING A FEW INDIVIDUALS IN THEIR POVERTY CASES WILL ONLY GARNER THIS VERY FEW VOTES FROM THEM. THE HELP SHOULD COVER AND EFFECT MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE. THEN MORE VOTES WILL GO TO THE PAP.

"THE PEOPLE OF HOUGANG HAD MADE THE SACRIFCES FOR DEMOCRACY OF SINGAPORE". THIS SENTENCE TOUCH THE HEART OF MANY VOTERS OF HOUGANG. THEY ARE HAPPY BECAUSE THE WP ACKNOWLEDGES AND PRAISES THEM FOR THEIR COURAGE. SAME GOES TO THE PEOPLE OF ALJUNIED.
MORE VOTES IS GOING TO SWING TO THE WP.

2.     IN ORDER TO WIN BACK HOUGANG IF PAP LOOSES THIS BY-ELECTION, DESMOND MUST CONTINUE TO FIGHT FOR THE WET MARKET AND THE LINK WAY PROJECTS.
IT MUST BE MADE KNOWN TO THE PEOPLE THAT HE HE SPEARHEADED AND MANAGED TO BRING BACK WHAT THE MAJORITY PEOPLE NEEDED. THESE ARE THE THINGS HE SHOULD DO TO SHOW THE PEOPLE OF HOUGANG THAT HE REALLY DELIVER WHAT HE HAD PROMISED AND HE REALLY CARES FOR THE PEOPLE OF HOUGANG. SHOW THEM YYOUR RESULTS DESMOND AND YOU WILL BE REWARDED.

3.    THE RECENT UNFORTUNATE HAPPENINGS INVOLVING FOREIGNERS CAME VERY UN-TIMELY.
THE PAP GOVT. MUST MAKE SOME ANNOUNCEMENT TO SAVE MORE VOTES FROM BEEN ERODED TO WP. THE PEOPLE OF HOUGANG MAJORITY FALLS WITHIN THE  LOW AND MIDDLE INCOME
  GROUP. THEY ARE WAITING FOR SOME DEVELOPMENT AND GOOD NEWS BEFORE DECIDING ON WHO TO VOTES. PLEASE CAPTURE THE HEARTS OF THESE UNDECIDED VOTERS.



Guest
20 May 2012, 2.05PM
I think little of PAP.

They hold the nation's purse strings, full authority over the constitution, full access to data from all Stat Boards ie MoM, MoE . . .etc
Guest
20 May 2012, 12.10PM
Desmond Choo has been walking the grounds of Hougang and warming to the residents there for the past 5+ years????????????

really meh?
(Guru)
Woody
20 May 2012, 12.41PM
Quote
BRANCH CHAIRMAN PROFILE
Desmond Choo Pey Ching 朱倍庆

Before his appointment as the Second Adviser to Hougang Grassroots Organisations in Feb 2011, he had worked extensively in the Marsiling and Tampines East Constituencies.
Unquote.

He was probably in Hougang two to three months just before the May General Election last year when the party decided to change Eric Low, the previous candidate.
Guest
20 May 2012, 1.13PM
Sorry, its my mistake. It should be "for more than one year".
Guest
20 May 2012, 2.49PM
1 simple mistake destroy all credibility of article.

Employ me and I will show you how to write winning article.
Guest
20 May 2012, 4.19PM
I disagree. The mistake confirms that the writer is definitely not a PAP supporter. Otherwise, he will have all the facts concerning the PAP at his finger tips. It also confirms that the writer is not a PAP member. Otherwise, the article would have been vetted by senior members before it is published.
Guest
20 May 2012, 3.44PM
wow now PAP launching counter propaganda articles?

I so scared lah, but really can't help laughing at feeble attempts, ha ha.

You guys are also so late. I remember only after approximate 5 days of campaign in GE 2011, then such counter propaganda rebuttals or articles are launched and thereafter disappeared forever into oblivion after GE 2011. 

This created doubts in sharp observers that where have you guys been all these years and how come you guys cannot even last few months after GE 2011 whereas unhappy Singaporeans are still blasting PAP non stop till today and this is real genuine unhappiness and frustrations as compared to PAP feeble counter propaganda strategy.

If you still cannot get such obvious hints, then change the head of PAP internet strategy department, ha ha
Guest
20 May 2012, 4.23PM
Look, if it is PAP counter-propaganda, would it have made such fundamental mistake  as the length of time that Desmond Choo has been walking the grounds of Hougang?
Guest
21 May 2012, 2.09AM
Look, I really really do not support no particular party -- not sure about the original poster though. But your logic seems to be: if there was a mistake in the writing, then it cannot be part of the PAP machinery? Is that what you're saying?
Guest
20 May 2012, 4.13PM
Since you claim neutrality, I suggest you listen carefully to last night's WP rally speech on youtube before you make judgment.
Guest
20 May 2012, 4.30PM
To be neutral, the writer should listen not only to WP rally speeches but also those of the PAP. Either that, or the writer should not listen to any rally speeches.
Guest
20 May 2012, 6.20PM
Ha ha ha, Temasek Review display his penmanship name as Mr Khianglang

More like bo standard lang and bo check bo chap style lang

Low quality, not credible and not convincing article.

Simple mistake like Mr. Desmond Choo walked the ground in Hougang for 5+ years.

Can we trust all facts writer wrote? 

May be the writer is actually opposition supporter trying to show bo standard PAP supporter. Sabo PAP, very good idea, but more likely bo standard writer, ha ha ha ha, too bad, you got caught but very sharp and alert and more capable writers.

PS: now this bo standard lang trying to cover up with theory like because didn't check that's why definitely not from PAP propaganda, ha ha, my toes are laughing at this plaster aid, PAP style of plaster aid perhaps?
Guest
21 May 2012, 10.46AM
Are you sure the writer of the TRE article is the same as this one here? There is a slight but important difference in the first line between the two articles. Most probably Khianglang copy the article from here and mod it for TRE.
Guest
20 May 2012, 9.26PM
I support you. I will re-post for you on www.singaporechatforum.com too.

Never mind, next time check before posting. What to do, already done, no choice.
(Guru)
GuardianAngel
21 May 2012, 9.27AM
We should stay neutral on Political business, just like Zao Bao on sunday published an article on PM Lee visit to Hougang Ave 3, the newspaper said he met voluntary group distributing ration to needly elderly supporting to WP.  
This is really not true at all, as today they published another "Clarify" on 2nd page of Zao Bao at the right bottom of the page, which I don't see it is a sincere clarified on what they had wrote wrongly on saying the voluntary group under WP.    That make me really feel can I trust all the news which published on the newspaper or not???
Guest
21 May 2012, 10.08AM
Nobody can change our mindset of having different voices put into parliament, right?
(Guru)
GuardianAngel
21 May 2012, 11.26AM
Clear your mind, think for the good and vote for the right choice you want to vote, who to vote upto you own decision, just follow you own instinct to do so and no regret after that.
Guest
21 May 2012, 1.10PM
Two thoughts to share about Hougang by-election and party politics (and I'm borrowing from
some comments from forums):

1) Grandfather to grandson on why he chose to vote a particular candidate from the party he supports;
    "He may be a monster, but he’s our monster.”

2) "Just don’t confuse a vote aligned with party affiliation with an “unthinking” vote. In large measure the   
     thought goes in at the selection of party affiliation as we work through the “world view” we believe is
     best/most sucessful. "

I think recently there has been much emphasis on the importance of voting for the right party ( as against the individual). Hence the party could sack the member and deprive him of his seat to which he was duly elected by the people.

A curious Senior
(Guru)
GuardianAngel
21 May 2012, 2.19PM
You can say how good a person is but the sense of those who are intouch with him will know best, as the sensor never lies of how they feel about the person.    People who are capable enough also from the way a person speak can tell how good and what kind of quality they are.   So just leave it all to the voters to choose, the result will tells....!
(Guru)
GuardianAngel
23 May 2012, 1.37PM
Out look can be changed, but the internal unable to change, unless he/she changes him/herself.
Discussion Forum - Archives


Search Archives

Best viewed at 1024*768 resolution with IE 7.0 or FireFox 3.0