reaching everyone for active citizenry @ home
Singapore Government
 
 
Welcome to the REACH Portal.

i-REACH (May 2013) is out now.
 


Find us on
Twitter Facebook SMS YouTube RSS
A-  |  A+

Discussion Forum

29 Aug 2012, 12.01AM
In response to the prime ministers NDR 2012 coverage on discrimination against foreigners, I would like to highlight that discrimination works both ways. Some Singaporeans are xenophobic but many more are frustrated by the government favoring foreigners over locals. I would like to relate what is happening on the ground to the government.

I worked in AIA Singapore as an Actuary and this is a highly regarded profession. There is no lack of Singaporean actuarial science graduates and there are far from enough jobs for them in Singapore. In my office, many young Singaporeans are passed over for fresh graduates positions for Malaysians because the hiring managers are Malaysians. It is telling that more than 90% are foreigners and 75% are Malaysians. There are some really good Malaysian candidates but as a whole, Malaysian candidates are not better candidates than Singaporeans from local universities and good foreign universities. I once overheard that a young Singaporean candidate is not chosen because he needs to go off for 2 - 3 weeks for reservist! WOW! Verbal discrimination against Singaporeans is also rampant and hurtful but I will not touch on them here as it cannot be verified easily.

Spewing vitriol comments online is much better than employment discrimination but what has the government done about employment discrimination? The government has turned on the "foreign tap" but did not ensure a level playing field. The first job deeply affects a person's career for the rest of his life. We have no laws to protect locals from employment discrimination but our PM is willing to stand up for foreigners from fire online. Is this fair for Singaporeans? This is exactly the frustration from locals who feels that the government is favoring foreigners over locals. Another case that is very obvious is the way our government treat new citizens and give out stipends to help foreign students, lets just say that original citizens also have a hard time paying for education (many took loans) and it is equally demanding on our lifes and aspirations to serve national service. Why should new citizens not serve NS and original citizens goes to jail if they do not want to serve? Why should local students take loans (many of whom have better grades) and foreigners get stipends? I have 3 colleagues who were on such schemes. I have heard many Singaporean soldiers said that they rather be foreigners during reservist, get free university, don't need to serve army and just give up Singapore citizenship when they retire! Does the government think this is the way forward? I think Singapore is in serious trouble as there will be too few that is loyal to this land to bring the nation forward.

If citizens from another country (say Australia or Korea) faces the same employment discrimination and competition as Singaporeans, the government would be dealing with a sharp spite in hate crimes or even riots and not some nasty online comments. The government should be grateful for a peaceful and civilised citizenry and focus on doing its job of serving Singaporeans.
376 views  |  14 comments & replies  | 
Guest
29 Aug 2012, 12.24AM
We are always at fault, others always better and others always right, yawn, what a boring National Day Rally, nothing new, nothing inspiring, nothing bold.

I notice that there are people on Reach knowing what to first for the country. That the first thing is to set the direction where the country to go, away from money oriented and economic oriented goals and the starting point is to dump and forgo the economic benefits from casinos which is to shut down the casinos. And that is a bold move in the right direction.

This is a good idea to get the beginning step forward right to set the direction, the rest will follow. Not my idea, just agreeing.

Guest
29 Aug 2012, 9.15AM
Spamming.
Guest
29 Aug 2012, 3.12PM
Spammer calling others spamming, very funny indeed.
Guest
29 Aug 2012, 6.47AM
Fully agree with you and we want this government  to prove to all Singaporeans what they mean when they say Singaporeans First Policy!!!

We have have to bear this in mind in whatever we do daily "Singaporeans First Policy"

We have seen very little from the government so far
Guest
29 Aug 2012, 10.13AM
The *** government is still on drugs?

Let me put it simply, they raised the expectations of citizens SO high and then later, dropped us on the ground. So, who is at fault first?

The government said our Airport #2, PSA Port #2, Education System Top 100 in the World, World Class Transport System, LKY is famous . . .etc then, invited foreign *** to fill this land, of which half of them are of poor quality.

IF the government wants to boast about our achivements, then THEY should be happy to face all the direct consequences. No point being childish, esp Shanmugam and try to tai-ji away responsibilties of his own colleagues. IF they failed in thier job, tell them off and get them replaced!


Solar


Guest
29 Aug 2012, 7.27AM
I would like to quote the PAP, Singaporeans' online discrimination of foreigners are "Unpopular but Necessary"
Guest
29 Aug 2012, 9.27AM
i have worked over 15 years in 4 countries in europe and asia and i would point out that vitriol against foreigners is not a singapore only phenomenon. it occurs when citizens feel unjustly marginalised in their own countries or feel that their sovereignity has been threatened- it may just be a perception rather than reality.

i think rather than condemn it, we should moderate the more violent ones and celebrate the fact that singaporeans care enough about the country and its wellbeing to feel so passionate about their causes. find out the root causes of the unhappiness than dismiss it as online noise. you know what they say about smoke and fire.

i certainly do not want to go back to colonial days where we kowtow to foreign overlords. showing we have a backbone is not a bad thing. when caucasians beat up our taxi uncles, we should be quick and just with our punishments. when chinese break the traffic laws in singapore, we have to be swift on meting out justice. there should be no exception.

do celebrate singaporeans' love for the country. it happens in other countries and in much stronger doses. the message i hear from PM is that we should go back to our roots as an entre pot hub where nationalistic fervour has no place... he is telling me that this is a hotel, not a home.
Guest
29 Aug 2012, 11.04AM
I've heard your "tune".

You are well "travelled" and that's all.

It is regretful you dont seem to have benefitted from it at all?

You seem to be just as myopic and xenophobic as the 1st day you stepped out of Singapore.

Goodness and your return is meant for the "good" of Singapore?!

Have you real "wisdom" to share, or you are as good as the frog who never leap out?
Guest
29 Aug 2012, 12.32PM
Please get it right! We are not just in great trouble. We have been sold, lied to and forced to accept our fate. I am glad we are fighting back. This is the Singaporean they don't expect.

Fat MaMa
Guest
29 Aug 2012, 3.09PM
My kind of guy - Fat MaMa
Guest
29 Aug 2012, 9.56PM
In my ex-office at Robinson Road, there is a Jessica who is a Big Bully, who terrorises other employees at the workplace. She is loud, boisterous and succeedingly good at bribing. This kind of behaviour was due to her bad childhood as her own parents do not even like her.

Sounds familiar now? If PAP do not even think that their own citizens are good and prefer to have them replaced by lousy FFTs, then the Big Bully personaility will emerge in the citizens. This growing- up process likely took 5 or 10 years to evolve. So, I am sure that the government was preapred for this 5 years ago.

So WHO is to blame? The government of course. If they do not want such Big bully personality then here are the solutions:

1) Send 600k citizens for free pschological sessions to re-direct their personaility

2) According to law, citizens can SUE the Big Bully in Singapore to resolve the case

3) Remove 30% of the Employment Pass holders soon

4) Ignore these 40% who have been clamouring and their 50k messages

5) Spent another $15 Million on integration programs or set- up another National Integration Council





Guest
30 Aug 2012, 10.13AM
My daughter went for the SIA cabin crew interview this year and in the queue with her was a married Korean PR lady who spoke a foreign form of ( bad ) English. This lady went ahead of my daughter in the interview rounds.

Wow. They are also changing the profile of the S'pore Girl? This is getting ridiculous.

In not giving jobs to S'poreans, the government is taking away the very thing that will keep S'poreans here. 

Really sad.

Ms Wee




Guest
30 Aug 2012, 7.27PM
If SIA wnat to follow PAP footsteps, the Singapore Girl will become a Rojak Girl
Guest
29 Aug 2012, 9.06PM
I am the OP. Thanks for all the replies here. I would like to add that we should and must remain respectful of foreigners because they are people too. Many are here to seek a better life and it is not their fault that our government made serious mistakes in its population policy. My personal experience with my colleagues from China and Malaysia has been good. Some of them are nasty but most are by and large decent. We should seek to improve our policies. All people would prefer to hire their own kind because it is easier to work with someone from a similar background, no one would turn down a free education and stipends with a chance for a better life, no one would want to go to the army at $300 a month. We should blame the driver and not the passengers. Once again, my heartfelt thanks for the meaningful replies.
Submit your comments
Read our Terms of Use
and forum rules before
you begin!

Top Contributors

Find out More!

Best viewed at 1024*768 resolution with IE 7.0 or FireFox 3.0