reaching everyone for active citizenry @ home
Singapore Government
 
 
Welcome to the REACH Portal.

i-REACH (May 2013) is out now.
 


Find us on
Twitter Facebook SMS YouTube RSS
A-  |  A+

Discussion Forum

17 Aug 2012, 5.42PM
4 comments & replies |by REACH Administrator | Our Common Space
The National Environment Agency (NEA) and National Parks Board (NParks) have responded to The Straits Times’ queries on the Auditor-General’s report released on 13 August 2012.  

For example, the Auditor-General Office (AGO) had probed five of NEA’s street-cleaning contracts worth $166 million in response to a complaint, and found that street cleaners at 190 out of 225 spots checked did not show up on schedule.  

Responding to The Straits Times, NEA said that adequate checks are in place to inspect the outcome of the cleaning.  Officers are assigned a specific set of roads to inspect and randomly check 20% of the roads swept each workday.  Some 180 ‘defect notices’ have been issued to contractors for lapses.  

NEA added that it will take action against contractors who did not perform their scheduled cleaning, and is checking if its officers have performed their checks diligently.  To better manage the cleaning of public areas, NEA has set up the Department of Public Cleanliness in April 2012 to take over other agencies’ cleaning functions and has increased its pool of audit officers.  It will also tap on GPS sensors to track cleaning work. 

On the AGO’s observation that turfed areas under NParks along 618 of 898 roads were not checked between March and October 2011, NParks said that grass at all its sites is cut every two to four weeks and 60 sites are assessed each month.  The 618 sites highlighted in the report were checked less often than urban areas, as they have a lower impact on the community.

Read the full story in The Straits Times articles and share your views! 

621 views  |  4 comments & replies  | 
Guest
17 Aug 2012, 5.53PM
" NEA’s street-cleaning contracts worth $166 million in response to a complaint" 

++++++++++

Is that for 1 year!?

Singaporeans and this Government continue to spend $166 million to clean up after our dirty habits! 
 

What does the Government think of this amount?

Is it justified?

Are we to go on burning $166 million dollars a year in the name of litter?

$166 million a year / 12 months is = $13.8 million a month!

Goodness! 
Guest
17 Aug 2012, 10.15PM
Can lah. Singapore is the richest in the world. They even prepare to pay a million dollar for a Gold Medal in Olympics. 166 million is sarp sarp water.
(Guru)
Woody
17 Aug 2012, 10.55PM
Why is AGO publishing it's report before getting the answers from NEA and NParks?  Is AGO not satisfied with the replies by NEA and NParks, in any case, who is supposed to take further action to correct the faults mentioned in the AGO reports? If there are no further action, it shows that it is just another "wayang" to show that AGO, NEA and NParks are working.
Guest
18 Aug 2012, 8.17AM
Looks like the annual AG's report is just for public viewing, not for problem solving. Year after year discrepancies are found. Yet, nobody seems to care much just because there is no deterrence. Isn't it time to fix this?

Fat MaMa
Submit your comments
Read our Terms of Use
and forum rules before
you begin!

Top Contributors

Find out More!

Best viewed at 1024*768 resolution with IE 7.0 or FireFox 3.0