reaching everyone for active citizenry @ home
Singapore Government
 
 
Welcome to the REACH Portal.

i-REACH (April 2013) is out now.
 


Find us on
Twitter Facebook SMS YouTube RSS
A-  |  A+

Discussion Forum

6 Aug 2012, 5.52PM
3 comments & replies |by REACH Administrator | The World and Us
Singapore cannot completely eradicate fraud and bad conduct, even though it has created a system that is very clean and efficient by international standards, said Law Minister Shanmugam to 1,800 residents at a National Day dinner in Chong Pang on Saturday. 

“There will be people who, whatever rules you put in, they will look to find a way around the rules and they will fall for temptation. There is no society in the world, in the past or the present, where every person is totally clean,” said Mr Shanmugam. 

He emphasized that in the clean and corruption-free society of Singapore, wrong-doers will be exposed and punished regardless of who and how high they are. "In the last 55 years, the political leadership has emphasised moral rectitude and correct conduct in public service. If anyone breaches that, if anyone goes out of that, it is likely to be found out and severe punishment is certain for those who are guilty."

Mr Shanmugam also touched on the issue of meritocracy, in relation to a Straits Times Forum Page last Thursday that Singapore’s meritocratic system “inflates egos of those who succeed such that their sense of entitlement and privilege can supersede their better judgment”. 

He questioned the basis of this statement, as it is not logical to conclude that countries with high meritocracy will have high level of corruption nor that less meritocracy means less corruption. He highlighted that Singapore is built on the fundamentals of meritocracy and equality of opportunity and that the government has to constantly re-examine whether its policies are consistent with these fundamentals.

Read the ChannelNewsAsia.com article “Severe punishment "certain" for those guilty of corruption: K Shanmugam” for more information.

What are your views on the Singapore system of efficiency and meritocracy? 

637 views  |  3 comments & replies  | 
Guest
12 Aug 2012, 9.43PM
More double talk and misdirection?  The PAP are masters at legalizing your corruption so what exactly is "corruption" now?

By your standards, you can even pass a law saying we are allowed to take any car off the street regardless of whom it belongs to and on paper, you eradicated car theft 100%.
Guest
11 Aug 2012, 6.44PM
Rubbish. We got MP be defence lawyer for corrpution.

That is call poor discipline in PAP.
Guest
7 Aug 2012, 11.31AM
I agree with Minister Shanmugam comments.

Additionally, in my own personal opinion, it has partly to do with how people are recruited into organisations where the focus maybe overly on education results and experience, but less on character; and how people are promoted and appointed into managerial positions or positions dealing with finance.

For instance, when a person is hired, start them out at a lower position for 6 months to a year, and see their character. If the person is shows good character, then promote them to the position that the company originally intended for the hire. This is better than asking references from a candidate during interview process because there is no guarantee that the person the company (HR) calls will be the former manager of the candidate, especially in big organisations.
Submit your comments
Read our Terms of Use
and forum rules before
you begin!

Top Contributors

Find out More!

Best viewed at 1024*768 resolution with IE 7.0 or FireFox 3.0