Discussion Forum

19 Jul 2012, 2.53PM

6 comments & replies |by Guest | Our Common Space

MCYS Reach Gov house rules are publicly disrespected all along as

this gov feedback section was poorly managed by MCYS civil servants are ignoring steams, fire and stones hurled by cowardly

cowardly gladiators - the most despicable netizens who dare to

detest anyone, from the politician to the common man on the street. They have all the time on the net to create a furor. Then they watched

who will retaliate against them, confident their misdeeds will be found out, get deleted and then they will be back again. Nothing can really stop their ill intentions. We see these ppl are having so much time in their life and looking to victimize others. I really love to put fight with these bullies and if I have to use their hurting words, it's my pleasure to put my comments where it hurt most!

I pity ppl who won't retaliate - smart ppl, yes. *****s who have no disrespect topics for discussion are a threat and either you ppl bite em back with your powerful fangs, or they will lol and call you names. So as they are reading my lines here, let's see how much poison they can throw to throw again. Those on-line werewolves are wretched bloggers who are obviously without jobs, full of judgments and definitely they outwitted the Reach administrators because they know MCYS can't do anything against them beside deleting their comments. It is like locking up a criminal for a day and release him the next day.

398 views | 6 comments & replies |

Sort By :

(Guru)

GuardianAngel

19 Jul 2012, 4.49PM

We used to hear about gov dept not doing this not doing that when people quiry and seek for support. But from my experience in Reach, during my period of writing from 2009 till now, many things have been done and act on the feedback. I feel good in staying here to write, even though sometime I may feel some disturb in here.

(Guru)

Woody

19 Jul 2012, 8.19PM

I agree with GuardianAngel, it is good that Reach Admin's policy to tolerate most of what have been written in this forum, otherwise, it will either invite more compalints against Reach Admin instead of other more important issues or it will silence all the critics and close down Reach. I support Reach Admin policy!

(Guru)

GuardianAngel

20 Jul 2012, 2.09PM

We contribute here is because we care for Singapore as we are Singaporeans and I think we should play our part as a Singaporeans, but I also hope those who are sitting there getting high pay to think harder as well, as if I can think of that, I don't think you can't, reason very simple, I am a very common and simple people here, and I can think of that so can you too. Just have to think harder cause you are paid to think, and I not. :-)

Guest

19 Jul 2012, 3.21PM

Don't understand. You lost an argument and debate?

Relax, we learn from each other. Losing is no big deal, from losing, we improve.

Where you lose? Perhaps they are right and you stubbornly cling onto your views.

REACH Administrator

20 Jul 2012, 3.18PM

Dear Contributors,

Please be reminded that the REACH discussion forum is not a platform for personal attacks, insults or derogatory remarks about fellow participants and/or others.

REACH reserves the right to remove topics or postings that are deemed inappropriate, irrelevant and/or insensitive to other users. Kindly refer to our website's Terms of Use for more information.

We would like to highlight in particular that users who use the platform to create a false identity through impersonating any person or entity, either through Guest or registered accounts, would be infringing our Terms of Use.

Participants who flout our Terms of Use will be warned and if they continue to do so, they will be barred from participating in the forum.

Thank you for your understanding.

Regards,
Ling (REACH Administrator)

Guest

20 Jul 2012, 4.38PM

Point taken, and valid.

However REACH Admin.

Please do note.

It is also possible it is the same (registered) person, whom chooses, NOT to sign in for a particular post, or thread, to avoid being "detectable", or be penned down for writing badly, or for debating badly, etc.

In such cases, who is to tell? Another words, is the accuser "wrong" to identify incorrectly?