reaching everyone for active citizenry @ home
Singapore Government
 
 
Welcome to the REACH Portal.

i-REACH (April 2013) is out now.
 


Find us on
Twitter Facebook SMS YouTube RSS

Replies to Feedback

8 Mar 2012, 10.24AM
55 comments & replies |by REACH Administrator | Replies to Feedback


In the coming year, smokers will have fewer public places to light up at as the smoking ban will be extended to common corridors, void decks, staircases of residential buildings, sheltered walkways, overhead bridges and outdoor hospital compounds.  Smoking will also be prohibited within a five-metre radius around bus shelters.  Smoking is currently not allowed in most indoor public areas and on all public transport.

This move follows a public consultation exercise last year by the National Environment Agency (NEA) and Health Promotion Board (HPB), which attracted 8,000 respondents with 89% of them supporting an extension of the smoking ban. About 85% wanted the extension to include residential buildings.

Senior Minister of State (Environment and Water Resources) Grace Fu, told Parliament that the implementation of this move will be refined in consultation with the community and building owners.  The long-term goal is to prohibit smoking in all public places except at designated smoking areas."Our aim, in collaboration with HPB, is to work towards a future where Singaporeans consider smoking not only detrimental to health, but also socially unacceptable", she said.

Here, we bring you SMS Grace Fu's speech in Parliament on " Enhancing the Quality of Life " delivered on 6 March 2012.
6084 views  |  55 comments & replies  |  Add a comment
Page 1 of 2
Guest
9 Mar 2012, 11.56PM
I applaud the extension of smoking ban at more public places, however the smoking ban policy
along corridors at public housing (HDB) has resulted in smokers to puff away in their homes usually near the kitchen windows, toilets and living room windows. This is worst as the 2nd hand smoke goes straight up to the HBD flat right above. It is obvious that policy makers do not live in HDBs. 

The policy of a 5 metre radius ban at bus shelters is questionable in its ability to enforce. Who is to say that someone is smoking within the 5 metre radius? Will there be measuring tapes placed conveniently at all bus shelters?

I wish to propose that smoking be allowed only in designated confined smoking rooms. This is commonly found at international airports of China, Japan, South Korea and many others countries are built so that smokers can puff all they want in such rooms and the rest of the non-smokers can happily breathe fresh air that they are rightfully entitled to. With the availability of these room, enforcement of smoking bans become clear cut. The government may question the ability to finance the building of such confined rooms. I strongly believe that the taxes earned per cigarette should be more than sufficient to finance such rooms. Alternatively, this may present an opportunity for enterprising private firms to manage such confined rooms and charge users for usage. 

Extending smoking bans to more public places does discourage smokers by increasing the level of inconvenience to light up. However, a more effective method to increase inconvenience to smokers is really to restrict the places where one can puchase cigarettes. Currently, cigarettes and tobacco items are sold everywhere, at 24 hours convenience shops, coffee shops, NTUC supermarkets, petrol kiosks...etc. It should not be a difficult task for the government to put a quota to the license available to sell tobacco items similar to how the government chooses to control vehicle registration quotas. 

Is the government really serious about getting tough against smoking or is this 5 metre ban simply a smokescreen for the governments dependence on tobacco item taxes?
Guest
10 Mar 2012, 6.45PM
i totally agree with the rest of the guests. this is as good as forcing the non-smoker to inhale more second hand smoke especially during their resting time at home. shouldn't there be a more emphasis on smoking restriction in residential units where more vulnerable young are segregated in the residential building. Even though, this provide a good image to other countries by restricting smokers from smoking in the public. This does not help to protect non-smoker at home when smokers are compelled to puff even more heavily at home?
 
Guest
26 Sep 2012, 8.54PM
I fervently support the idea of designated smoking zone/rooms at HDB void desk.  There just doesn't seem to be any other alternative that can nil this issue at its core.  Extending bans in public places are only minor incremental improvements, whence it's benefits are only marginal at best.  Even in absence of these bans, one can simply walk away from cigarette smoke at any of these shared public area.  Ironically, for those unlucky ones, the single largest exposure to second-hand smoke is right in the comfort of their own home, where they and and their precious love ones spend most of their time.  Sadly, there is no mandate to stop these inconsiderate home owners from puffing away and snaring others with poisonous gas, deriving these unfortunate ones the right to clean air and healthy living.  

HDB owners who smokes at home argue that they have the legal rights to smoke in their own premises. After all they did pay for their flats and thus have the rights to do however they will in their premises, isn't it so?  I cannot but agree.... But, I beg to ask, what about non-smokers whom also paid the same for their HDB flats?  What about these people whom wants to protect their love ones from posionous cigarette smokes?  What about those whom only ask for healthy air in their own house they call home?  Don't they too have rights to live healthly and  protect their love ones?  Don't they have rights to clean and fresh air?  Afterall, it is an established fact that smoking kills, and if so, why should anyone be ***** and extend tolerance to inconsiderate neighbours that in the first place harms you and your love ones with second-hand smoke?

I implore to those in powers to pass mandates and laws to help these innocent people.  Help us, please.
Guest
18 Dec 2012, 5.51AM
dear sir/mdm,

please tell me, with nearly every place banned, if the government were to ban smoking even in our own home, where are the smokers going to smoke?

thank you. 
Guest
17 Oct 2012, 2.08PM
  Smoking while walking in public should be banned. In Japan, where smoking is prevalent among its citizens, the people do not smoke while walking along the roads. While the situation inside buildings may be different, you can enjoy a smoke-free walk along any road in Japan. In Singapore, you will be blasted with cigarette smoke along roads, especially when waiting at pedestrian crossings and you cannot avoid these second-hand smoke.

  The ban on smoking in covered car-parks should be extended to multi-storey car-parks, if it is not yet implemented.  If it is, more enforcement action should be taken.
 
  While smoking in lift lobbies is banned, many HDB flat-owners still smoke there. In my block, two different people smoke in the lobby and/or rubbish bin area. These selfish and inconsiderate people do not wish to smoke at home and poison their family members but rather poison other neighbours.

  I also support the idea of banning smoking in HDB flats. Cigarette smoke comes into my flat at all hours of the day and night but I cannot do anything about it.

  Why should the majority of the population be held ransom by the action of a minority?

  
Guest
15 Jan 2013, 2.14PM
I support the extension of the smoking prohibition especially in residential spaces such as the common property areas.  However, I do see a loophole in the clause.

Residents who smoke with open patios and balconies are not addressed.  As second hand smoke is even more dangerous than inhaling, more should be emphasized on confining smokers in a designated area away from residents.

And the 5m rule may not be realistic if a playground or communal place is near by as smoke travels.

I hope that NEA will add the above-mentioned places as an addendum to the list of smoking  prohibited places.

Guest
21 Jan 2013, 1.09AM
The idea of extension of ban on smoking is good, my house is near to lift and staircases the smoke is directly entering into my house eventhough i shut the door. i have requested them politely about the prohibited aresthey are saying ok at that particular moment, but continuing with their acts again. i have to say the same to too many ppl. are they really not aware of the ban.. or just doesn't want to follow. my family cant able to breath fresh air after staying at home as well. you can see a lot of cigars near the lift, corridors, staircases and voiddecks.. i try my best to escape from smoke daily but couldn't either outdoor or indoor..i even see alot of ppl smoking near the no smoking signs..i hope the proper action will be taken asap to keep our health and environment clean..
Guest
27 Feb 2013, 9.39PM
Just would like to add (and refute),

I live in a landed property and the situation is not exactly brighter than any HDB resident.

A new tenant who lives 2 houses away from me puffs at night and other strange hours (between 5 to 8 am) and the smoke wafts into my room. (I assume that the puffer smokes right at the window.) If I do not use a fan switched on at full blast, the smoke stench will extend into the rest of the house, which is, the least to say, very annoying. This has been occurring for the past 6 months, and it has been very unpleasant because I cannot retire to my own room for a good rest because of the stink in my room.

So, I would like to ask if the government to spare a thought for some of us who live in landed property and face similar situations, to consider extending bans to private housing/landed property areas as well.

Puffers, if you really want to smoke, close all your windows and doors in your room/home and suffer yourselves. Some of us do have issues when breathing cigarette smoke and find the (daily) experience of having to endure something like this very unbearable.

(Maybe you will think twice/be more considerate when your whole room smells of your "favourite" cigarette smoke smell. My assumption is that the reason why you all even smoke outside is that the stench might be unbearable even for you all.)
Guest
24 Dec 2012, 12.49PM
Why we can't ban selling of cigarette like we ban selling of chewing gum? Is chewing gum doing more harm than cigarette?

I have a neighbour below my unit who always smoke near the window as he do not want his family members get the 2nd hand smoke, then it makes my family gets the 2nd hand smoke. What can I do with this?

And all these banning that are implement will be useless when no one enforce it. If I report the offences, by the time your enforcer is here, those smokers already get back home after their smoke.

Just ban it....
Guest
24 Mar 2012, 2.58PM
Everyday I walk from my flat to the MRT station and along the way there will always people smoking. So even when I am walking, I am still a second smoker.

Please extend the smoking ban so that smokers are not to smoke while walking.
Guest
29 May 2012, 9.47AM
When one inhales the cigarette smoke while walking behind a smoker with a lit cigarette, one inhales both the exhaled second hand smoke PLUS the raw unfiltered smoke arising from the cigarette.

Therefore, one (the non-smoker) is worst off than the smoker himself!

So, while the smoker may claim his rights to smoke, I too claim for my rights to smoke-free air.
Guest
14 Jun 2012, 3.11PM
Doesn't the smoker inhale the unfiltered smoke as well and he is closer to the source?
Guest
7 Sep 2012, 3.55PM
Your ***** right, walking and smoking at the same time shows no respect to others around him/her. This must put to a stop once and for all, hate it!
Guest
19 Mar 2012, 4.56PM
Extending smoking ban in the public will result in increasing number of smokers lighting up at home(HDB flats). 
At the moment, I am already tolerating the 2nd hand smoke rising to my unit as I am in no position to tell the resident below my unit not to smoke.
I hope the government will set no-smoking rules in all high-rise residential buildings(HDB, condos., etc.).

Guest
19 Mar 2012, 10.07PM
Perhaps you may extend your feedback to

email to Contact_NEA@nea.gov.sg or
submit electronically via Online Reporting Centre or
contact our NEA Call Centre Hotline : 1800-CALL NEA (1800-2255 632)
members of the media can reach us at media@nea.gov.sg

Guest
14 Jun 2012, 10.31PM
If you really want to ban smoking, ban the smokers even in the hdb flats. Consider this, brother who is a smoker smoke inside his/her own room, kitchen, balcony anywhere he likes. Mother and his own siblings will suffer because of this. As we know , we are second and third party smoker (we inhale the smoke and the cigar remains in the flat after a long period). Seriously , imagine brother invite his smoker friend inside this will even be worsen.

I SUGGEST TO IMPLEMENT A LAW TO STOP THIS NON HEALTHY AND COSTLY BEHAVIOUR.

THERE IS NO REASON TO SMOKE INSIDE YOUR OWN HOUSE AS WELL AS OUTSIDE PREMISE.

BAN IT TOTALLY (LIKE CHEWING Gum)

Guest
9 Mar 2012, 12.20PM
Dear Sir/Madam,

I have a heart ailment and my wife and daughter both suffer from asthma. In addition my wife is also a COPD patient. She breathes through a breathing aid at night.

Almost everyday, my neighbours on my left and right of my house would smoke outside their house on the common corridor of our HDB flat.

The smoke and stench would definitely enter our house but we were powerless to do anything. Telling them off would definitely lead to an argument. So the extension of the ban to common corridors would definitely help people like me and my wife breathe fresh air and not polluted air.

I fully support the ban and if possible ban totally smoking in all public places.


Rahmad Bin Badri
(Newbie)
CC
22 Apr 2012, 2.37PM
I totally agree with the smoking ban. Statistics 'shown' only reflects a small percentage of smokers. But is that true? Then why are there so many cigarette butts littering all over the place? I live on the top floor, and my neighbour 2 floors down has been smoking like a chimney day and night, and even my neighbour downstairs and me are not spared. The smoke comes in through the window.  What can the government do to help all of us? As passive smokers, can I go and claim medical fees from my neighbour when we see a  the doctor due to their smoke-inhalation related illness? Smoking should be banned at home too. Smokers might think this is unfair. But is it fair to make others suffer as well? Not everbody is rich enough to own air conditioning to block off cigarette smoke. 

I'm suggesting to install a smoking room at the void deck - just like airports. At least all the smokers together can smell each other's smoke. Smoke detectors should be installed at all areas. Anybody caught smoking 'illegally' should be fined.  

Guest
8 Oct 2012, 10.22AM
The majority of Singaporeans do not smoke. Why is our health held ransom by the 14% who smoke? They do not care about their health or the well being of their wives, children, friends and loved ones and continue to smoke and expose them to the risks of 2nd hand smoke. Why would they care about exposing other people to their 2nd hand smoke? Please do more to protect us from 2nd hand smoke, it kills.
Guest
10 Oct 2012, 12.19AM
it is really sad that nothing can be done except to be stuck with smoking neighbours. inhaling high dosage of second hand smoke is not an enjoyable experience.
Guest
7 Feb 2013, 11.41PM
As many places in Singapore is banned for smoking. Smokers will turn smoking at home especially at the window and balcony...another great issue will arise, as the second smoke will enter into above houses.
That's a issue I'm facing...my neighbour below is smoking in interval of 15 min to half an hour. My balcony door and windows must always be closed or my house will be like a smoking den. And many instances my daughter will be the victim as the hall is her play area.

I have spoken to this neighbour but he continues his way. I have no choice but file a report to HDB but they can't do anything too as he is smoking at his premises.

I think the government should ban smoker's smoke from entering others houses too. This issue really affect us very much yet nothing we can do to stop.

Guest
8 Apr 2012, 4.57PM
The smoking ban has been more constricted to include more public spaces. However, the definition of areas to allow smoking such as the 5m radii (who would know/care abt the exact area unless is properly designated but it would not look well in the streets) and in coffeeshops (non-smoking area too near smoking area due to space constraint of smaller scale coffeeshop). Staircases of HDB blocks (vague as smokers would not have space to smoke) or void decks as banned smoking areas has to be monitored. It is diffucult and expensive to deploy NEA officers around the island to catch smokers in illegal smoking areas, so it would be not practical.

The health concern for second hand smoke and more so for the smokers themselves have to excercise more personal responsibility (the series of anti-smoking campaigns) and enforcement has to be stepped up. There should be a proper space for smokers who still continue to smoke and without affecting the non-smokers.
Guest
12 Apr 2012, 12.23AM
Perhaps the authority can employ the public to help.

If the public can submit a photo of a smoker in breach of the smoking ban, the authority will fine the smoker and the person who submits the photo gets a commission out of the fine.  If there is more than 1 submission, the 1st photo that is clear enough to show the breach will get the commission.

Considering the authority has no time nor money to monitor what they are implementing, the public is the best and they are everywhere equipped with cameras.
Guest
6 Dec 2012, 8.25AM
When will smokers become socially responsible people??!!
How to and who will educate smokers to be socially responsible people??!!
I hope this days will be here soon, we need the authority to be SINCERELY and SERIOUSLY involve to tackle this HEALTH HAZARD issue.
Now, with this population, we have both local and foreign smokers!!
Guest
9 Apr 2012, 9.39AM
Perhaps, as the designated "yellow box", we should have them in an actual box, with a very good pump, that will eliminate all of the smoke. So they can get their nicotine fix, if they really wanted, while their smoke is eliminated as far as possible.

Interestingly, cigar-sales are either good or bad enough that Habanos(cigar shop) in a mall is moving from a level 1 location to a level 2 location(presumably bigger, but lower rental per/sqm due to potentially lower traffic).
Guest
20 Jul 2012, 12.21PM
I suggest to ban smoking in hawker centres and coffee shops totally. The areas demarcated for smokers are meaningless because the smoke would not stay within the boundaries. Those non-smokers who eat in these places have no way to avoid the smoke and cannot just simply walk away before finishing their food. These will also remove conflicts between smokers and non-smokers while dining together.
Guest
13 Aug 2012, 8.00PM
I can't wait for the rules to kick in, especially at common corridors and staircases. When will this be implemented? I'm literally *sick* and tired of having to breathe polluted air, thanks to our chain-smoking neighbour next door.
Guest
30 Sep 2012, 12.28AM
Same goes here i would like officials. to take action on this asap. Both my neighbours are chain smokers and also on the top floor there are group of people always smoking while chit chatting for hours and hours and the smoke is directly entering into the house..we are really fedup and not sure what action should be taken. can't able to breath proper air..i will get slight headache if i breath cigar smoke while travelling i will even vomit...also found few ppl on the streets are smoking on the face itself..not sure why the ppl doesn't have any curtosy towards others..why non smokers should suffer for this..i knew here now and there ppl are getting fined while smoking in public places and i even found alot of ppl smoking under the smoking sign banned sign board itself..not sure why the action is not taken on them.. Hope proper action will be taken to maintain clean and green environment...
Guest
6 Oct 2012, 10.04PM
has anyone reported about their smoking neighbours to NEA or MPs? does it help?

why is smoking banned only to public area? does it mean non-smokers att home, have lower health risks when inhaling second hand smoke?
Guest
6 Dec 2012, 1.14AM
My family have been suffering from the lower unit smoking pollution into my HDB unit in the past 4 years, The unit below has was occupied by foreign employees whom we believe owner of the house have rented out  since 4 years ago. The foreign employee tenants to this unit keep changing, and the recent group of 8 persons who just moved in since 1-Nov, have been causing very bad smoking pollution to my house day and night.

My wife and I had tried to speak to the tenants about the problem, requesting that they could help to prevent the cigarette smokes running into my house though they have the liberty to smoke in their unit. The tenants however arrogantly replied and challenged that 'there is no law in Singapore says that they cannot smoke in their house, and where about the smoke wish to travel is not their responsibility'. The tenant even argued that I should seal up all my windows if I do not want smoke to get into my house

We reported the matter to HDB, NEA, Mediation Centre, RC Committee, Neighborhood Police and also lodged the complains several times with the MPs during the meet-the-people session. It is to my family disappointment that for 4 years and to date, there is no improvement to the situation. When we tried again to reach the the authorities above, we were told that such smoking problem dispute is the responsibility of HDB to look into and it is not within their authority to handle. Further, the letters from MP to the HDB authority does not result in any effective measures to resolve this health hazard problem to my family.

Mr Leow
Guest
1 Jan 2013, 9.15PM
No smoking education should go all the way to TV media, channel 5, 8, suria, vasantham. Places like coffeeshops, hawker centres, bus stops, excercise areas, parks, MRT stations, HDB void decks, homes etc. All public dustbins should have no smoking sign label. Strong enforcement is also neeeded. You can ban many public places with no smoking, but no action taken is useless., smokers just simply don't care.
Guest
10 Mar 2012, 9.18AM
First of all, an excellent move.  Bravo!

For me, I would like to see all our parks to be smoke-free, eventually, starting with major parks like the Botanical Gardens, Bishan Park, and then the rest.  A park is a place for recreation and family get-together.  Smokers not only pollute the environment for joggers, it also affect children as secondary smokers.  Not only that, I have see cigarette butts thrown indiscriminately, even when there is a trash bin 3m away.  Smokers may smoke in the carpark before entering our Parks, but the minute the cross the treshold of the Park boundaries, the next time to light up, in when they return.

The other area is pedestrain crossings.  While waiting for the green man at these pedestrain crossings, non-smokers have to tolerate smokers puffing away while waiting to cross.  In countries like Japan, no smoking sign in painted on the ground at every pedestrian traffic crossing to minimise the risk of secondary smokers.

The other thing is enforcement.  I have seen people puffing at the lift landing, right in front of the no smoking sign.  I have walked into a lift, reeked with cigarette smoke.  Who is to tell errant smokers to smoke somewhere else?  Are there citizen patrols over issues like these?
Guest
10 Mar 2012, 6.52PM
I don't quite understand the rationale of restricting smoker to smoke outside a certain perimeter. What is the different in smoking only outside 5 m of the bus stop when we are all breathing the same air? i wonder will the air be fresher at the bus stop if smokers restrict themselve to smoke only 5 m away from the bus stop. will smoker bring a measuring tape around to ensure they obey this rule?
i have seem cases where smokers will smoke next to the rubbish bin and the bin is situated just 3 m away from the bus stop.

Guest
12 Mar 2012, 11.17PM
Hi

I applaud the smoking ban. I am currently a victim of 2nd hand smoke at public places.

Having said that I always feel that the authorities only take the easy way out, and not putting more effort in many aspects. Fisrt they also need to understand the older generation may have a harder time to give up habits.

So other than just providing easy but not effective solution like designated smoking places, why not build enclosed shelters for smokers (but provide good air filters and ventilation, otherwise they will suffocate). Yeah sure the next question from govt always who pay. Since you are collecting high tobacco tax, shouldn't you can put aside some $$ for this. Another thing is building landlords are very rich, they should also help build these to protect non-smokers.

Smoking should also be totally banned in coffee shops. In the same nature, they should build enclosed ventialted shelters, just like they need to provide toilets.  

So I still see the ban fall short of many things. And as I mentioned, other than bans alone which is not entirely effective, enclosed ventilated shelters should be considered. And if these shelters are well designed commercially and patented, these can be a business venture to maket overseas which can bring in revenue to fund more things.
(Newbie)
Sunny G
21 Mar 2012, 11.03PM
What's up with so much talk on ban smoking and etc. Absolutely BS if bluntly no action! Don't believe you are welcome to visit Boon Lay Hawker Centre at coffee stall no 26. I've done my part reporting 2 years ago but till today every day between 7am to 7.30am there will be 2 smoker blatantly lighting up oblivious to everyone. Funny thing just under the no smoking sign!
Madam Foo, no offence but stop making a mockery and kick some butt to walk the talk. If not don't bother to even raise the topic!
(Newbie)
i.think
22 Mar 2012, 8.45AM
Ultimately, we will only be restricting smoking at public places, but how are we going to tackle the problem of smoking habit. Smokers can light-up in their homes and thereby affecting family members etc.

If all shops are entitled to sell cigarettes, then it is so easy for a smoker to get hold of a pack. We should make it very difficult for smokers to buy their cigarettes for example within a typical neighbourhood area, you will find provision shops under HDB blocks which sell cigarettes. Why not think of restricting these shops around neighbourhood from selling cigarettes? This way, a smoker will have to walk a distance to get his pack.
Guest
23 Mar 2012, 4.20PM
We should address the root cause. Ban the importation of tobacco just as we did with chewing gum (a much lesser evil) and we instantly have a smoke free Singapore for all to enjoy. This is easier to enforce than trying to police a list of place where smoking is banned (usually not very effective). The statistic shows a 14% smoking rate which mean more than two thirds are non. This is a huge mandate. This is an area for the government to put her foot down firmly instead of exercising extreme tolerance.
(Newbie)
Seng Kok
24 Mar 2012, 10.30PM

I agree with the move of extension smoking ban at more public places.  I would like to suggest that may be Government can look into to restrict NS personnel and army from smoking so that we can have healthier army personnel in our arm forces.  Secondly we can also add in additional condition not to issue working permit or passes to all foreign smoking workers coming to Singapore.  By doing these on top of the other restriction measure I believe we will able to cut down a lot more harm on second hand smoke.

Guest
30 Mar 2012, 2.22PM
In the ,ilitary, the smokers can run faster and longer then most non smokers
Guest
31 Dec 2012, 6.16PM
drugs stimulate the body temporarily,but will eventually wreck it.that is,if what u're saying is even true.

besides smoking,we should make cheebaecity socially unacceptable-that is,girls wearing short tight shorts that are often torn and have trailing threads about,so disgusting its a wonder they can feel confortable going out in this way,and their moron boyfriends even weirder for condoning such an ugly grotesque act from his SO,though he'd be too embarassed to dress like that himself.
Guest
31 Dec 2012, 6.21PM
so unladylike too,its a downfall of singaporean females.no girl should be more obscene than a boy,but its obvious thats what they are.
Page 1 of 2

Vodcast

Post-Budget Forum 2013 – Opening Remarks by Dr Amy Khor and Mrs Josephine Teo

Podcast

Policy Study Workgroups Appreciation Lunch on 23 September 2009 - Opening Speech by Dr Amy Khor
Speaker
REACH's Chairman, Dr Amy Khor announced the formation of three new Policy Study Workgroups



Download (MP3, file size: 1.02 MB, Time:01:51mins)
Subscribe: [feed]

Best viewed at 1024*768 resolution with IE 7.0 or FireFox 3.0