reaching everyone for active citizenry @ home
Singapore Government
 
 
Welcome to the REACH Portal.

i-REACH (May 2013) is out now.
 


Find us on
Twitter Facebook SMS YouTube RSS

Snapshots of Hot Issues

10 May 2010, 9.00AM
2 comments & replies |by REACH Administrator | Snapshots of Hot Issues
Review of weighting given to Mother Tongue Language in PSLE

Education Minister Ng Eng Hen recently said in an interview to the press that his Ministry is currently reviewing the weighting given to Mother Tongue language in the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) and its teaching methods. The possible reduction in weighting of the Mother Tongue Language in the PSLE has since attracted much discussion on the REACH platforms.

While contributors welcome a review of the Mother Tongue language pedagogy, most are concerned about the possibility of a cut back on the weighting, which they feel runs contrary to Singapore's bilingual policy and the Government's efforts to promote the Mother Tongue language. Many disagreed that the move will help strengthen Singapore's bilingual edge, arguing that students would, as a result, feel less motivated to do well in the subject, and this would undermine the standard of the language. Some contributors perceive the move as benefiting students from English-speaking families who do not excel in their Mother Tongue language, and that students who are generally stronger in their Mother Tongue language may lose out to their peers in the education system. Several contributors expressed gratitude to the Government for its emphasis on the Mother Tongue all these years, which they noted has helped Singaporeans retain their cultural roots as well as give them a competitive advantage in the globalised world.

Instead of tweaking the weighting of the Mother Tongue language, contributors suggest that the Education Ministry consider lowering the entry requirement for the language at selected top schools only; or allowing students to compute their PSLE aggregate score based on any of their best three subjects, with a minimum pass grade for their English and Mother Tongue language. Some feel that it is imperative that the Ministry customise teaching methods to help weaker students and continue to instil interest for the Mother Tongue language amongst students. They urge the Ministry to move cautiously on this issue and seek public views before implementing the proposed change.

Others however, support the move, noting that this is in line with Singapore's changing socio-economic and demographic profiles where there are increasingly more children from English speaking homes. Some children from these homes have difficulties coping with Mother Tongue and are disadvantaged at the PSLE and their subsequent posting to secondary schools. They note that these children have to struggle to keep up with Mother Tongue, putting in an inordinate amount of effort going for tuition classes etc and yet often do not do well. This has in turn seriously affected their morale.

Noting the public's concerns on the issue, the Ministry of Education and the Prime Minister has reassured the public that emphasis on Mother Tongue remains a vital feature of our education system, and that the Government will progressively strengthen and update the teaching and examination of Mother Tongue. In a statement issued after a meeting with three key representatives of the Chinese cultural community, who initiated a petition to express their concern about possible tweaks to the weighting given to Mother Tongue language, Minister Ng stressed that bilingualism has served Singapore well and will continue to be a cornerstone of our education system. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Education Minister Ng Eng Hen will meet the press on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 to address these concerns and outline the Government's thinking on the issue.

5164 views  |  2 comments & replies  | 
Guest
5 Oct 2010, 4.41PM
Mother Tongue is a language.  You don't tweak the teaching of a language just so it will suit a slow learner.  Neither should you alter its entry standard just so to allow slow learners in into a certain programme.  If you are weak, work hard on it instead of asking for the paper to be simpler.  A language must be taught with the purpose of developing a proficiency in it.  You don't want everyone to pass it and yet unable to speak it, do you?

A language comes about through thousands of years of use and a big bulk of it remains unchanged.  Why then are we jumping about like fleas barking about changing it to suit our changing times?  Have we mastered the bulk of it yet?  No?  Then go learn and leave the little changes to be absorbed in its own time.

Get settled on a text book (for each level) that can be used for the next 50 years (being friendly to the environment is a side benefit), get students to master it and we are done.  Those slower students?  Let them not cry over the 10-15 marks they are getting.  After all, they are slower, no?  Or like everyone else they also want greater rebates?  Pooh!
(Newbie)
Denis Ho
17 Nov 2010, 11.56PM
Maybe you should consider that the education system reflects the goals of the governments for Singapore to continue to prosper. Thus, it actually reflects the state and demands of the world. Soon or later chidlren would become adults and face the world, so why don't we let them see the reality of the world instead of bluffing them that its okay if you don't do well, the education system will adjust to your preferences. Though this sounds a bit harsh, it is important that children quickly grasp the reality and adjust to it. Those who struggle there is always help and assistance around and they also must take the effort to find them and not wait for help to find them.

Vodcast

Post-Budget Forum 2013 – Opening Remarks by Dr Amy Khor and Mrs Josephine Teo

Podcast

Policy Study Workgroups Appreciation Lunch on 23 September 2009 - Opening Speech by Dr Amy Khor
Speaker
REACH's Chairman, Dr Amy Khor announced the formation of three new Policy Study Workgroups



Download (MP3, file size: 1.02 MB, Time:01:51mins)
Subscribe: [feed]

Best viewed at 1024*768 resolution with IE 7.0 or FireFox 3.0