reaching everyone for active citizenry @ home
Singapore Government
 
 
Welcome to the REACH Portal.

i-REACH (April 2013) is out now.
 


Find us on
Twitter Facebook SMS YouTube RSS

Snapshots of Hot Issues

5 Jul 2011, 4.24PM
6 comments & replies |by REACH Administrator | Snapshots of Hot Issues
Speaking at the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety in Vienna, Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Mr Masagos Zulkifli noted that lessons must be drawn from the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster, and that safety should be a key consideration with the building of nuclear power plants based on zero tolerance for accidents
 
Following Mr Masagos’ comments, contributors express concerns over the use of nuclear energy.  Some note that the building of nuclear power plants based on zero tolerance for accidents is impossible in practice.  They highlight that past accidents like the Nicoll Highway collapse and breakdown of the Singapore Flyer had resulted from failure in observing safety guidelines, an indication that Singapore is not ready for nuclear power. 
 
Contributors also express concern over the impact of nuclear accidents that would result in death and other long-term consequences like widespread cancer, mutation of genes and miscarriages.  A couple of contributors also question whether Singapore has sufficient space for a nuclear plant, noting that there must be sufficient distance separating the plant from citizens, for safety.
 
While some contributors call for continued research to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of alternative energy sources like solar energy, one contributor highlighted that alternative fuel sources do not have the capacity to generate baseload electricity.  He adds that having LNG terminals and other chemical plants in Singapore is just as dangerous, and that Singapore could still be exposed to nuclear energy if neighbouring countries went ahead with their plans to build nuclear power plants.  Another contributor suggests collaborating with foreign universities to offer courses in nuclear physics and technology, and working closely with countries like the US, China and Japan, who are pioneers in this area.
 
Selected Contributors’ Quotes:
 
“Singapore’s workforce and population are not ready…Japan has thrived on excellence for years and still had a major accident…Even shipyards can have explosions and accidents despite all the safety training and regulations.” – Dreamknight via discussion forum
 
“Even if we consider the nuclear option, do we have the space for a nuclear plant?  There must be some kind of minimum distance of safety separating the population and the plant…” – Guest via discussion forum
 
“The continued use of fossil fuel has resulted in climate change, which will kill more people than nuclear power ever will.  Alternative fuel sources do not have the capacity to generate baseload electricity.  Unfortunately, public opinion has been influenced by subjective opinion...” – Neutral Party via discussion forum
 
“MOE can consider working with NUS and NTU in partnership with foreign universities to offer courses on nuclear physics and technology.  If we were to go nuclear in future, preparation must start now.  We need to start training the engineers to do the job.  We also need to seek technical cooperation with countries that have pioneered the technology such as US, China, Russia, Japan and the EU.” – Melvin Emmanuel Chan via Facebook
40164 views  |  6 comments & replies  | 
Guest
4 Aug 2011, 9.31PM
If I read this article correctly, seems to imply if there are concerns about nuclear energy or if we are not ready for nuclear energy, then we should be working to address concerns and enhance our readiness for nuclear energy. Then, base on selected contributor quotes, then we should widen horizons and be open to explore the possibility of nuclear option?

Wonder if there is a comprehensive program to promote natural gas, solar, wind, tidal, energy sources in addition to energy reduction programs first e.g. LEDs, sensors and dimming technolgies.

Research into green energy like what we achieved splendidly with world class water treatment technologies could generate jobs of greater value than casino ones and also boost GDP you know?  It's clear we should scale up green energy programmes, if the majority does not want a nuclear plant in your GRC.
Guest
23 Aug 2011, 11.48AM
Nuclear is just madness and can only result in more disaster and insecurity to the world. Unfortunately given the fact that green technology nor driving efficiency can resolve energy security, many countries would still be inclined to build nuclear plants despite understanding its shortcoming. There are many possible terrible accident that had happen from accepting nuclear as a means for sustaining our energy needs. For instance, misusing them to produce nuclear weapons, accumulation of highly toxic radioactive waste that remains dangerous for millions of years, using .....

Better to pin our hope to green technology . I hope that our nation would take up ambitious project that can lower energy demand and also drive up energy efficiency. 

 
Guest
5 Aug 2011, 9.14PM
Does anyone really understand what this "nuclear energy" talk is all about?

In today's nuclear power plants, it is simply put --- sticking "hot" rods into water to produce steam and drive turbines.  What is so cool?  Steam energy is 19th century technology.  There are many ways to produce steam and doesn't steam produces heat too? 

What we really have about "nuclear energy" is a wrong application of atomic energy to generate steam and power turbines to produce energy.  It has little to do with Einstein's equation that takes place in the rods.

I'm sure even our NUS & NTU engineers are smart enough and do not require foreign talent (again?) to think of innovative ways to go green.
Guest
6 Aug 2011, 8.59PM

I hope our next generation does not have to live with a "nuclear casino".

A nuclear plant should never be built in the interest of shortest buck to meet energy extravaganzas and indirectly release possible contaminants into the atmosphere right into your living and bedrooms. One can even be so clever to call this subjective opinion, that is until something happens or observed only decades later.

Even the #1 economic powerhouse in huge deficit, is doing all the right things - morally and economically - to spend into research such as hydrgen fuel cells and implement solar energy programs, protect families and create jobs, lifting itself out of the doldrums during times of uncertainty.

If we go down the nuclear path, seems like we are unashamedly, taking a step back from research and going back to the dark ages now.
Guest
7 Aug 2011, 11.14PM
Use common sense everyone please.  If kenna something, where to evacuate huh?

As if our land welly big got many provinces to escape to hor.

Contaminants are permanent and we have to seek permanent residence immediately elsewhere.
Guest
18 Aug 2011, 10.43AM
Absoultely right. Please do not forget we lived very closed to the Ring of Fire. If there is a big eruption from our neighbouring country, how safe are we? Those who design the Nuclear Reactor will most likely be foreigners. We will be the one to mati. Stop wasting money and time on this issue

Vodcast

Post-Budget Forum 2013 – Opening Remarks by Dr Amy Khor and Mrs Josephine Teo

Podcast

Policy Study Workgroups Appreciation Lunch on 23 September 2009 - Opening Speech by Dr Amy Khor
Speaker
REACH's Chairman, Dr Amy Khor announced the formation of three new Policy Study Workgroups



Download (MP3, file size: 1.02 MB, Time:01:51mins)
Subscribe: [feed]

Best viewed at 1024*768 resolution with IE 7.0 or FireFox 3.0